Artificial intelligence isn’t just helping marketers find more leads, it’s helping them find the right ones. “AI isn’t just helping us find more leads, it’s helping us find the right ones,” says Rahul Talwar, Chief Marketing Officer at Axis Max Life Insurance. His team’s ongoing AI-personalised renewal campaign reflects a wider shift underway in India’s marketing ecosystem. Across sectors from SaaS and e-commerce to real estate, brands are using AI not just to expand pipelines but to improve their quality. The emphasis in 2025 has shifted from quantity to precision: marketers want leads that are relevant, high-intent, and more likely to convert.
The starting point is adoption at scale. Indian teams report high comfort with AI across campaign planning, content operations and sales enablement. That level of usage sets the base for smarter lead strategies, because the gains now come from how data flows between systems rather than from installing a single tool. Four data points frame the context for 2025. First, India’s workforce reports among the highest regular usage of generative AI globally, a factor that accelerates experimentation inside marketing and sales teams. Second, brand-side leaders in India highlight a strong payoff from real-time personalisation, with consumers responding better when messages and offers adapt within a session. Third, enterprise surveys show a rising share of companies attributing revenue impact to AI initiatives, suggesting that the move from pilots to scale is underway. Fourth, sector regulators and institutions note productivity benefits from AI in services like banking, which influences how financial brands approach acquisition journeys. These signals, taken together, explain why lead generation is becoming a systems problem that AI is well suited to solve.
In B2B SaaS, precision has replaced volume as the default target. Rather than treating every form fill as equal, teams score fit and intent using behavioural signals. These include time on high-value pages, product-qualified actions inside freemium tiers and engagement with technical documentation. AI models then surface accounts that resemble recent wins so that field teams can focus time where it matters. The sales desk sees fewer but warmer leads, and marketing’s task shifts to enabling that motion with content matched to stage and role. This is also where language models help. Drafting tailored emails for a purchasing manager versus a CTO used to be manual. Today, marketers generate first drafts in minutes and then refine for accuracy and tone. The result is more relevant contact without adding headcount. The caveat, which most teams accept, is the need for human review before anything goes out at scale.
E-commerce leans on AI for intent detection and timing. Instead of a blanket discount to everyone, retailers use session data to infer whether a visitor is comparing prices, evaluating shipping timelines or deciding on a size. Promotions trigger only when there is a clear nudge to conversion, such as hesitancy at checkout. Real-time personalisation also extends to creative. If a returning shopper has previously engaged with sustainability content, AI assembles product cards that include certification details and care instructions. The goal is to reduce friction and keep the prospect moving forward. This approach stands or falls on relevance. As one media lead cautions, personalisation can cross a line if it reveals more than a consumer expects. The practical fix is to explain why a message was shown and to allow easy opt-outs from certain data uses.
Real estate, an industry with heavy offline closure, has become a surprising test bed for AI-assisted lead qualification. Developers and brokers route enquiries from listings, social ads and walk-ins to conversational agents that capture key details, answer basic questions and book site visits. The agent’s transcript feeds a lead-scoring model that flags buying horizon and budget fit for the sales team. The playbook is simple: respond instantly, reduce manual follow-ups and pass only qualified prospects to humans. Teams then loop back closed-won data to media platforms to build lookalike audiences. The closed loop is where AI’s compounding benefit shows up, because the next campaign starts with a better hypothesis about who is actually in market.
Marketers describe this progression from rules to learning as the main unlock of the past year. A senior leader in professional services put it directly: “For us in B2B, the marketing funnel is no longer a funnel. AI helps us show up wherever the customer is. Since we can’t advertise being a regulated firm, content personalisation and multimedia AI tools are how we accelerate go-to-market strategies,” said Anuradha Gupta, Executive Director of Marketing, Deloitte. The comment captures a wider reality. When top-of-funnel reach is constrained by category rules, growth depends on relevance and timing. AI helps teams orchestrate those touches across formats without inflating budgets.
Practitioners are equally clear about boundaries. At a recent industry discussion on hyper-personalisation, leaders from FMCG and consumer brands stressed the need for context and restraint. Tejas Apte, General Manager for Media at HUL, put it in operational terms: “We’re all profitable companies, we can’t afford to hyperpersonalise for 1.4 billion individuals.” Riya Joseph, Head of Media at Britannia, added a consumer guardrail: “If it goes too far, it becomes creepy.” Surbhi Gupta, Head of Digital at Birla Opus Paints, tied personalisation back to conversion, noting that AI helps the team keep potential customers engaged through the journey and intervene in real time when a checkout stalls. These observations matter in lead generation because they define what “smart” looks like. It is not infinite variation for its own sake. It is precise variation that moves a prospect one step forward.
Under the hood, three technical patterns show up repeatedly. The first is predictive scoring. Models trained on past conversions and disqualifications rank incoming leads so that humans work from the top of the list. The practical win is time saved and fewer missed opportunities. The second is next-best action. If a prospect downloads a comparison sheet, the system suggests the next touch, which could be an email invite to a demo or a call from a specialist. The third is dynamic creative assembly. Instead of pre-building hundreds of variants, teams define content blocks and let AI assemble the most relevant version within guardrails. Each pattern on its own is useful. Together, they create momentum, because insight from one stage improves decisions at the next.
Data quality decides how well these patterns perform. Teams report that the hard work in 2025 is less about model selection and more about cleaning inputs. That is why marketers sit with analytics and sales to agree on shared definitions. What is a marketing-qualified lead in this business? Which actions count as high intent? How do we tag content in a way that is consistent across channels? When those agreements are in place, AI systems become more reliable and the feedback loop tightens. Real-world content operations echo the same point. Generative tools can produce first drafts of emails, landing pages and product explainers at speed. The value appears when the drafts are grounded in accurate product data, updated pricing and brand-approved phrasing. Teams therefore invest in source-of-truth repositories and approval flows that can handle higher throughput.
Marketers are also frank about the human-in-the-loop requirement. Large models are powerful but not infallible. Teams set review thresholds before material goes live, especially for regulated categories like finance and health. That guardrail extends to measurement. If an AI model claims a lift in lead quality, analysts replicate the result on a holdout group before rolling out. The operational mood is pragmatic. AI is treated as a co-pilot that speeds up the work, not as an autopilot that can be left unsupervised.
Trust and privacy are the final ingredients. Consumers want personalisation but not surveillance. The workable approach is to explain clearly how data is used and to give practical controls. Many brands now disclose when a chatbot is an AI agent and route sensitive queries to a human. Several have also tightened data retention for ad-hoc campaign audiences. Those decisions are not just policy choices. They influence campaign performance by keeping more prospects open to ongoing contact. When leads opt out less, the pipeline stays healthier.
For teams looking to improve lead generation with AI this year, the playbook emerging in India has five parts. Start with a narrow use case where latency hurts conversion, such as follow-ups on demo requests or abandoned carts. Install the connective tissue between marketing and sales so that outcomes feed back into targeting. Standardise definitions and tags so that your models learn on clean examples. Use generative AI to compress content cycles but keep human review. Communicate data use simply to preserve goodwill. Each step is small enough to ship quickly and big enough to show a measurable result.
Quotes from practitioners underline both the promise and the limits. Deloitte’s marketing lead points to AI as the glue that holds complex B2B journeys together when traditional advertising is constrained. HUL and Britannia leaders remind peers to keep personalisation anchored in business logic and consumer comfort. Birla Opus highlights how AI is deployed against a specific conversion outcome rather than as a blanket tactic. Taken together, these voices describe a practice that is maturing. The experiments are fewer. The systems are more connected. The returns are clearer.
The outlook for the rest of 2025 is incremental rather than speculative. Expect more teams to stitch AI across the funnel instead of running isolated tools. Expect creative operations to get faster as content blocks and product data are standardised. Expect privacy controls to be designed into lead flows rather than added at the end. And expect marketers to keep testing where AI beats a rule and where a human is still best placed to decide. Lead generation has always been about being in the right place with the right proposition. AI’s contribution is to make that judgement faster and more consistent, without losing the clarity that comes from a human understanding of customers and markets.
Disclaimer: All quotes are either sourced directly or attributed to public statements.
Related Articles
