

Eros International to Re-Release Raanjhanaa with AI-Modified Climax, Stirring Creative Debate
In a move blending nostalgia with emerging technology, Indian film studio Eros International has announced the re-release of its 2013 romantic drama Raanjhanaa—this time with a twist. The new version, edited using artificial intelligence, alters the film’s original tragic climax to a more upbeat, “happy ending,” sparking both intrigue and criticism from creative circles.
Directed by Aanand L. Rai and starring Dhanush and Sonam Kapoor, Raanjhanaa was originally celebrated for its emotionally powerful and heartbreaking conclusion. The AI-modified version is being released alongside its Tamil-dubbed counterpart Ambikapathy, with Eros positioning it as a test to appeal to audiences who may prefer feel-good resolutions.
Director Aanand L. Rai Distances Himself from Re-Edited Version
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from the film’s director, Aanand L. Rai, who has publicly disassociated himself from the AI-generated version. “This is not my film,” Rai told the media, expressing concern that the altered narrative compromises the emotional integrity and artistic vision of the original work.
Rai’s stance brings to light broader concerns in the creative community around the use of artificial intelligence in post-release editing. While AI offers significant possibilities for restoration and localization, its deployment to fundamentally change a story’s narrative arc has opened a new front in the debate on artistic ownership.
Eros Positions the Move as a Creative Experiment
Eros International defended the AI-enhanced re-release as an attempt to connect with evolving viewer preferences. The company stated the change was a creative experiment aimed at exploring how modern audiences respond to alternate storylines, particularly when delivered through emerging technologies.
This development comes amid a growing wave of AI applications in the entertainment industry—ranging from AI voice dubbing and de-aging technology to predictive script generation and character modeling. However, few major studios have yet ventured into retroactive narrative changes using AI, making Eros’s initiative a notable case.
A Flashpoint in the AI vs. Authorship Debate
The re-release of Raanjhanaa with an AI-altered conclusion raises urgent questions for the film industry: Who holds the right to reshape a narrative once it has entered public consciousness? Is audience preference enough justification to modify a story’s soul?
While AI-driven tools have already been embraced for tasks like editing, dialogue enhancement, and language translation, their use in changing fundamental plotlines is still seen by many as a red line. Critics argue that such moves could erode the sanctity of storytelling, where creator intent is paramount.
At the same time, proponents point to a future where customizable story experiences—powered by generative AI—allow viewers to engage with narratives in new and interactive ways.
Audience Response Will Be Crucial
How audiences react to the AI-updated version of Raanjhanaa may well set a precedent. Will fans embrace an alternate ending that reimagines a decade-old classic? Or will they side with the original creator’s vision?
As the line between technological capability and creative ethics blurs, the film industry faces a pivotal moment—one where legacy content and next-gen tools must find balance.